On Sat, 9 Sept 2023 at 14:17, Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> > --- > host/include/i386/host/cpuinfo.h | 2 +- > hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 4 ++-- > hw/i386/amd_iommu.c | 4 ++-- > hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 4 ++-- > hw/i386/kvm/xen_xenstore.c | 2 +- > hw/i386/kvm/xenstore_impl.c | 2 +- > hw/i386/pc.c | 4 ++-- > include/hw/i386/topology.h | 2 +- > target/i386/cpu.c | 4 ++-- > target/i386/cpu.h | 4 ++-- > target/i386/kvm/kvm.c | 4 ++-- > target/i386/kvm/xen-emu.c | 2 +- > target/i386/machine.c | 4 ++-- > target/i386/tcg/translate.c | 8 ++++---- > tests/tcg/i386/system/boot.S | 2 +- > tests/tcg/i386/x86.csv | 2 +- > 16 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c > index bb12b0ad43..1afcef5937 100644 > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c > @@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ static Aml *initialize_route(Aml *route, const char > *link_name, > * > * Returns an array of 128 routes, one for each device, > * based on device location. > - * The main goal is to equaly distribute the interrupts > + * The main goal is to equally distribute the interrupts > * over the 4 existing ACPI links (works only for i440fx). > * The hash function is (slot + pin) & 3 -> "LNK[D|A|B|C]". > * > @@ -2079,7 +2079,7 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, > MachineState *machine) > } > > /* > - * Insert DMAR scope for PCI bridges and endpoint devcie > + * Insert DMAR scope for PCI bridges and endpoint device I suspect this should be "devices" plural. > */ > static void > insert_scope(PCIBus *bus, PCIDevice *dev, void *opaque) > static void ioportF0_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t data, > unsigned size) > { > --- a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c > +++ b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c > @@ -4729,7 +4729,7 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cpu, int level) > /* > * Put MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL first, this ensures the VM gets out of > VMX > * root operation upon vCPU reset. kvm_put_msr_feature_control() should > also > - * preceed kvm_put_nested_state() when 'real' nested state is set. > + * proceed kvm_put_nested_state() when 'real' nested state is set. Should be "precede". > */ > if (level >= KVM_PUT_RESET_STATE) { > ret = kvm_put_msr_feature_control(x86_cpu); Otherwise Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> thanks -- PMM