On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 12:57:08PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote: > I managed to reproduce it. It's not the return path error. In hindsight > that's obvious because that error happens in the 'recovery' test and this > one in the 'plain' one. Sorry about the noise.
No worry. It's good to finally identify that. > > This one reproduced with just 4 iterations of preempt/plain. I'll > investigate. Great, thank you! -- Peter Xu
