On 9/15/23 21:12, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 15/9/23 17:25, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:
On 9/15/23 01:22, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
The check on tcg_enabled() make it clearer we want
this call under TCG.
tb_flush already has a check for tcg_enabled() in its definition.
Do we really need to check for same before calling it?
Good point, I didn't notice. I'll replace the call in
tb_flush() by an assertion.
I guess you meant asserting in else case of the check inside ?
We may want to have the check internally only than having every caller
to do that.
Thanks
Harsh
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org>
---
accel/stubs/tcg-stub.c | 4 ----
cpu.c | 15 +++++++++------
gdbstub/softmmu.c | 5 ++++-
hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
