Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk> writes: > On 11/09/2023 06:15, Markus Armbruster wrote: > >> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org> writes:
[...] >>> I'm not sure when we want a write-only QOM boolean property, so I >>> genuinely ask, since I agree introspecting QOM object fields from >>> the monitor is helpful. >> >> I suspect write-only properties came out of QOM's generality curse. Do >> we have even one? QOM's design makes this somewhat to tell. > > Good question. Given that it's towards the beginning of the next dev cycle, > perhaps it is worth sending a patch to find out? ;) Getting rid of unused generality / unnecessary complexity is good.
