On 22/09/2023 23:21, Peter Xu wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 08:27:24AM +0000, Zhijian Li (Fujitsu) wrote: >> I'm worried that I may not have enough time, ability, or environment to >> review/test >> the RDMA patches. but for this patch set, i will take a look later. > > That'll be helpful, thanks! > > So it seems maybe at least we should have an entry for rdma migration to > reflect the state of the code there. AFAIU we don't strictly need a > maintainer for the entries; an empty entry should suffice, which I can > prepare a patch for it: > > RDMA Migration > S: Odd Fixes > F: migration/rdma* > > Zhijian, if you still want to get emails when someone changes the code, > maybe you still wanted be listed as a reviewer (even if not a maintainer)? > So that you don't necessarily need to review every time, but just in case > you still want to get notified whenever someone changes it, that means one > line added onto above: > > R: Li Zhijian <lizhij...@fujitsu.com> > > Do you prefer me to add that R: for you when I send the maintainer file > update?
Yes, thanks. my pleasure :) > > I'm curious whether Fujitsu is using this code in production, if so it'll > be great if you can be supported as, This depends on Fujitsu's customer requirements, I don't really know either :) Thanks Zhijian perhaps part of, your job to maintain > the rdma code. But maybe that's not the case.> > In all cases, thanks a lot for the helps already. >
