Re: [PATCH 12/13] migration: Use vmstate_register_any() for eeprom93xx

[Stefan Berger]

On 10/19/23 15:08, Juan Quintela wrote:

We can have more than one eeprom93xx.
For instance:

e100_nic_realize() -> eeprom93xx_new()

Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.ibm.com>

---
  hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.c b/hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.c
index 1081e2cc0d..57d63638d7 100644
--- a/hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.c
+++ b/hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.c
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ eeprom_t *eeprom93xx_new(DeviceState *dev, uint16_t nwords)
      /* Output DO is tristate, read results in 1. */
      eeprom->eedo = 1;
      logout("eeprom = 0x%p, nwords = %u\n", eeprom, nwords);
-    vmstate_register(VMSTATE_IF(dev), 0, &vmstate_eeprom, eeprom);
+    vmstate_register_any(VMSTATE_IF(dev), &vmstate_eeprom, eeprom);
      return eeprom;
  }