пт, 17 мар. 2023 г., 13:54 Alberto Garcia <be...@igalia.com>:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 11:03:51AM +0300, Andrew Randrianasulu wrote:
> > To be honest after sleeping over problem I found situation beyond
> > ridiculous.
>
> In the course of this thread you have had some of the most active and
> knowledgeable QEMU developers explain you in a very reasonable way
> the problems that the project is having and the reasons behind the
> decision to deprecate 32-bit host support.
>
> While it is perfectly understandable that you are unhappy with the
> loss of a certain feature, your attitude towards the people who are
> doing the actual hard work of keeping the project running
May be running project *that* hard actually not very good idea, too. We are
not supposed to die for some business, I hope?
has been
> that of contempt ("the project needs different developer culture")
This was probably badly worded - I mean culture of dividing all patches
into very small pieces and running full compile pipeline on each
nano-change very often.
I consider this bad idea, from cpu time/energy consumption standpoint.
and
> of uniformed suggestions ("maybe the CI system should tweak the ccache
> settings").
>
> I would ask you to please reconsider before going on like this and to
> think twice about whether venting your frustrations in this mailing
> list is helpful or useful for anyone else.
>
Here is our (?) qemu running on DOS.
https://www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?t=12035
Please note that myself is also qemu contributor, even if minor (search
mail list for my soname)
> Regards,
>
> Berto
>
