Hey Alex and Paolo,
I saw there is some code related to AVX
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c#L668
Does that mean in some special cases, kvm supports AVX instructions ?
I didn’t really know the big picture, so just guess what it is doing .
Thanks,
Xu
> On Mar 4, 2024, at 6:39 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> !-------------------------------------------------------------------|
> This Message Is From an External Sender
>
> |-------------------------------------------------------------------!
>
> On 3/4/24 22:59, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> Since you're not seeing a KVM_EXIT_MMIO I'd guess this is more of a KVM
>> issue than QEMU (Cc kvm list). Possibly KVM doesn't emulate vmovdqu
>> relative to an MMIO access, but honestly I'm not positive that AVX
>> instructions are meant to work on MMIO space. I'll let x86 KVM experts
>> more familiar with specific opcode semantics weigh in on that.
>
> Indeed, KVM's instruction emulator supports some SSE MOV instructions but not
> the corresponding AVX instructions.
>
> Vector instructions however do work on MMIO space, and they are used
> occasionally especially in combination with write-combining memory. SSE
> support was added to KVM because some operating systems used SSE instructions
> to read and write to VRAM. However, so far we've never received any reports
> of OSes using AVX instructions on devices that QEMU can emulate (as opposed
> to, for example, GPU VRAM that is passed through).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paolo
>
>> Is your "program" just doing a memcpy() with an mmap() of the PCI BAR
>> acquired through pci-sysfs or a userspace vfio-pci driver within the
>> guest?
>> In QEMU 4a2e242bbb30 ("memory: Don't use memcpy for ram_device
>> regions") we resolved an issue[1] where QEMU itself was doing a memcpy()
>> to assigned device MMIO space resulting in breaking functionality of
>> the device. IIRC memcpy() was using an SSE instruction that didn't
>> fault, but didn't work correctly relative to MMIO space either.
>> So I also wouldn't rule out that the program isn't inherently
>> misbehaving by using memcpy() and thereby ignoring the nature of the
>> device MMIO access semantics. Thanks,
>> Alex
>> [1]https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1384892
>
