Hi Rob,
> I guess if I had the money I would be on ArcGIS as this probably has a tool > to > do the job along with increased functionality, but unfortunately this is not > the case. with one difference: Arc* costs you thousands/year, while qgis costs you nothing and the development of the tool you need will costs you probably around just a few hundred euros. ;) and at the same time you contribute to make qgis a better software. > Besides, I get on well with QGIS and would prefer to stick with it. good! > If funding were to be available for any development work, > are there any systems in place to manage it, such as GAF, as referred to > above? http://www.qgis.org/wiki/Bugs I guess you can use this initiative also to ask develop something missing. Cheers -- Giovanni -- _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
