On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:17 PM, G. Allegri <gioha...@gmail.com> wrote: > That would ne a very interesting architecture Martin. > Each Service would manage its on requirements, for example its own internal > bindings to Python or whatever. > I'm not sure about the "fastgi nature" of the services. The server has a an > fcgi interface, ok, but the services should be indipendent from this > specific interface. The Server could be deployed in a different fashion, but > the services should ignore this.
Sure, it does not have to be bound specifically to FastCGI so that in future other gateway interfaces could be used. Martin _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
