Please Aldo note that the new labelling is very slow, and has a number of bugs to be fixed before removing the old one. Thanks.
http://faunalia.it/pc Sent from mobile, sorry for being short ----- Reply message ----- Da: bernhard.stro...@jena.de A: <qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> Oggetto: [Qgis-developer] Removing old labelling Data: lun, mar 5, 2012 07:08 Nathan, thanks for the move. Two labelling eninges is impossible to explain to users. One thing, though: The old engine allows for setting a rotation independent from also setting an x and y field. Bernhard Am 05.03.2012 05:11, schrieb Nathan Woodrow: > Hi all, > > Any objections for removing the old labelling stuff? > > Is there anything the old one can do the new one can't? > > I'm finding users are getting confused that there are two > different labelling engines and this is bad for user experience. Also > makes training hard as you have to tell people to ignore that part of > the program when labelling is something everyone wants to do. > > If all +1s to the above. > > Should we make this change in upcoming 1.8? > > - Nathan > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > > ________ Information from NOD32 ________ > This message was checked by NOD32 Antivirus System for Linux Mail Server. > http://www.nod32.com ________ Information from NOD32 ________ This message was checked by NOD32 Antivirus System for Linux Mail Server. http://www.nod32.com _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer