The purpose of a "geoprocessing framework" was exactly that, unify the way algorithms get exposed to the user. Victor has given a big boost to this with SEXTANTE, and it should let the user mix the modules easily to set up processing flows from different algorithms...
giovanni 2012/3/22 Alexander Bruy <alexander.b...@gmail.com> > 2012/3/22 Alexander Bruy <alexander.b...@gmail.com>: > > Well, but what about GSoC and ideas related to QGIS Processing > > Framework? This thread was started from Sergey's GSoC proposal > > focused on extending QGIS Processing Framework with new > > algorithms. > > > > 2012/3/22 Werner Macho <werner.ma...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi that's what i meant in my mail .. > >> We should look after a solution to present everything (all algorythms) > >> under one umbrella (one central point) sorted after functionality (or > >> something else) .. > >> It's always good to have more instruments to solve problems .. but you > >> have to find (and activate) them.. > >> So i still suggest to meet in lyon and decide howto deal with > >> different frameworks .. > >> Especially when Victor is coming to lyon .. and probably some other > >> framework developers too .. > >> I'd like to see many different approaches and solutions but only one > >> place to find them all to work with.. > > > > -- > > Alexander Bruy > > > > -- > Alexander Bruy > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer