>> I don't see why sextante in qgis has to change from MIT to GPL, does >> it really have to? >> No, it does not have to, from a legal point of view. >> > I do not think it has changed: java and python versions have no code in > common, so the author simply chose a different licence. > All the best.
Just to make clear. I prefer the MIT license in the case of the Java version, as it is meant to be used in many different apps (it is a library). I the python case, it is just a QGIS plugin, so I do not see much difference and i am happy with GPL as well. I think is a better idea, so as to have a homogeneous licensing across QGIS code. Regards _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
