Hi All, As Martin asked, could we know more about 2.0 roadmap planning and feature list? My concern is that we deployed QGIS in prod for 300 users, but we still miss some bugfixes and features to definitly switch. As long as I maintain two GIS solutions, I have double work, and I can't dedicate more time to QGIS. I would like to support prioritary issues before feature freeze. In the other hand, I can't wait until end of 2013 to fix 1.8 issues (raster print KO.. for example). We also just supported, with others of you, great tools like Atlas.. If a stable version with it is not released within a year, users will start to get annoyed, and will tend to use master for production use.. which is not a good target for any of us.
So what is the community plan? What should we do as users and sponsors? Should we ask (and support) a 1.8 bugfix release if 2.0 target moves again? Should we support a 1.9 release for 2013 spring, and let major API changes for 2.0 be planned to end of 2013? Does community have enough ressources to release a 1.9? Please tell us, we love QGIS and its community.. but we also like very much stability and visibility (and the captive users in my corp' too) RĂ©gis -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Merging-of-incompatible-changes-tp5010325p5010839.html Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer