Hi, +1 for including it to core. I use it every day, and users outside my administration are lost we not having the plugin enabled. But I can live until 2.1 since we have a default conf enabling that plugin for users. IMHO PSC has to decide what is the target version, but I don't remember a clear choix on the target here: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Memory-data-provider-persistence-td4108012.html <http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Memory-data-provider-persistence-td4108012.html> Shall QdataStream / sqlitedb / be embedded in QGS file or stay data along qgs file? We need a clear position since project file structure stability is really important for a GIS tool. Ccurrent behaviour is OK for me, but compressed archive including QGS file + data + other ressources like svg, images would be great and transparent from a user point of view. And user could still uncompress it to repair broken project.
Régis -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Memory-layer-saver-plugin-to-core-tp5044151p5044219.html Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer