Wouldn't it be good to have SEXTANTE as category in the bug tracker
(like fTools and GDAL tools)?
Bernhard
Am 17.04.2013 12:27, schrieb Victor Olaya:
Bernard's problem was related with using non-file layers in the
modeler. It was a very easy fix, so please, everyone that's using
SEXTANTE, share your problems so we can work on them and make the
software more stable. :-)
Thanks in advance!
2013/4/17 Bernhard Ströbl<bernhard.stro...@jena.de>:
Hi all,
just want to inform you that Victor was able to solve my two problems.
Number 1 (CRS missmatch) was kinda my fault (or let's say the fault of a
former QGIS version where my project originally was created in: QGIS did
compare proj4 definition and picked the first CRS the definition of the
layer matched. As EPSG:31464 and EPSG:31468 have the same proj4 definition
but the first is deprecated it was chosen, although my layer is defined as
EPSG:31468 in geometry_columns)
Number 2 (no PostGIS suppport) was fixed in master
Bernhard
Am 17.04.2013 09:24, schrieb Victor Olaya:
Bernhard
I am sorry to hear about your bad experience. Could you detail a bit
more about what you are doing (algorithms you are running, etc)?.
PostGIS layers should work without problems, but I have recently fixed
a problem with PostGIS when using SAGA algorithms, so there might be
other issues like that.
If you want, you can send me your layers and model, so I can have a
look and try to find out what is happening
Many thanks for your collaboration (and patience)
Victor
2013/4/17 Bernhard Ströbl<bernhard.stro...@jena.de>:
Hi all,
for a course I am about to give tomorrow I played a bit with SEXTANTE,
although I am going to teach geoprocessing with fTools (we are using QGIS
1.8). It was my first go with SEXTANTE and I was about to show what it
will
offer in the future. Therefore I built a small model with three input
layers
a buffer and two overlay operations. I did not succeed in running the
model
so I tried in current master.
As it currently is SEXTANTE is not operable for me (or I am doing it
wrong):
First message is "Layers do not all use the same CRS...." although they
definitely do and the same EPSG-code is noted in square brackets behind
each
layer name!? Second I get an "Error executing algorithm..." it seems as
SEXTANTE cannot use PostGIS layers as input (when I save them as shape
files
the model runs perfectly), this is a big limitation as my institution
stores
almost everything in PostGIS. (SEXTANTE should not offer PostGIS layers
to
choose as input layers then).
Well, this was a very disappointing experience because additionally QGIS
was
frozen two or three times opening or closing the model. I do not want to
complain, all I want is to ask for keeping fTools as they are until
SEXTANTE
can _really_ replace them in all aspects. Then we should remove the
vector
menue completely because I agree that finding the tool you are looking
for
is a lot easier in SEXTANTE.
my 2 cents
Bernhard
Am 17.04.2013 07:42, schrieb Anita Graser:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Mathieu Pellerin<nirvn.a...@gmail.com
<mailto:nirvn.a...@gmail.com>> wrote:
There might be a way to make most people happy here.
I find the vector menu a nice ui shortcut for useful functions. If
sextante relevant functions are at par (or better), couldn't the
vector menu items stay, which would please many, and when clicked
triggers sextante's function dialogue? Victor? Same thing could
happen with vector menu too. Sextante's analysis toolbar is super
useful but might be a throwback for some if vector / raster menu
functions disappear.
On human resource (coders and testers) and maintenance angles,
keeping to mechanism to do same thing is an obvious waste.
I see. So you'd suggest to keep only Sextante code (where duplicates
exist!) but provide shortcuts from the menu? I'd +1 that.
I've been testing a variety of functions in the menus and in Sextante
over the last days and there are always some broken ones. Neither
"package" is without major bugs today.
We need to get it together for 2.0 and that's easier if we can focus on
one.
Best wishes,
Anita
__________ Information from ESET Mail Security, version of virus
signature
database 8235 (20130416) __________
The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET Mail Security, version of virus signature
database 8236 (20130417) __________
The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
__________ Information from ESET Mail Security, version of virus signature
database 8236 (20130417) __________
The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
http://www.eset.com
--
Bernhard Ströbl
Anwendungsbetreuer GIS
Kommunale Immobilien Jena
Am Anger 26
07743 Jena
Tel.: 03641 49- 5190
E-Mail: bernhard.stro...@jena.de
Internet: www.kij.de
Kommunale Immobilien Jena
Eigenbetrieb der Stadt Jena
Werkleiter: Dr. Götz Blankenburg
__________ Information from ESET Mail Security, version of virus signature
database 8236 (20130417) __________
The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
