On 30/04/2013, at 19:11 , Nathan Woodrow wrote: > Hey all, > > There is only one day left in the logo comp. I have already had the final > round extended three times so this is it. Please let me know if you have any > feedback you would like me to leave on the designs at > http://99designs.com.au/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397 > > I think Larry said he is working on some new revisions of his logo which I am > keen to see.
Of that group, I'd plumb for 338. (I'd probably prefer the Q form used in 280 though) This is clearly a Q. Many of the rest (e.g. 336 and 50) look more like deformed circles. I found I needed the hands in 280 pointed out to me, and I think they'd be lost at a smaller size, but that the hands in 338 and 336 are much more obvious. After that I'd probably end up with 334 or something similar. I still really don't like 50, and would favour any of the others except 200 over it. I suppose I could live with 50 so long as no one *ever* drew it in brown. -ramon. _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
