Just to reinforce the point raised
The pan icon currently in Master are four arrows which are more associated with 
moving a graphic or a nudge, I would think the most well known symbol for that 
would be the famous little hand to pan

Cheers
 
Ing. Antonio Locandro
Tegucigalpa, Honduras

From: jonathanmou...@warwickshire.gov.uk
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 15:55:17 +0100
To: anitagra...@gmx.at
CC: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] New Icons - difficult to "read"

Hi Anita,I think we have to be fair and recognize that a GIS is a little more 
complex than a web browser and will always have more buttons. Many functions 
which have only one meaning in a simpler application can have different 
meanings in a GIS depending on context. To simply assume the context from the 
placement in a certain toolbar could raise other issues. 


Fair point, but that's why I also compared other GIS's where I could (ArcGIS, 
MapModeller (FME Data Inspector uses the refresh circle but doesn't have a 
back/forward feature) and noted that they hold the same convention.

Also, that was only one single example, there are others.These days people 
*expect* certain icons for certain things. To use a different icon throws away 
the years of pre-training the user will have already have using other 
applications that stuck to the convention.



I don't think I've ever seen a single application that had 10 icons that were 
mostly the same before in the same that the magnifying glass ones in QGIS 2.0 
are.
Regards,

Jonathan

On 28 May 2013 11:11, Anita Graser <anitagra...@gmx.at> wrote:


Hi,

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Jonathan Moules 
<jonathanmou...@warwickshire.gov.uk> wrote:



+1 for unified data adding button. From a use-perspective there's no good 
reason that raster adding should be separate from vectors for instance



In depth example: take the Back, Next, and Refresh view icons. The new QGIS 
icons all have a magnifying glass behind them (I can barely make out the 
"refresh" circle). Why? In comparison, I have four web-browsers in front of me, 
all have these buttons and all of them are simple arrows/refresh circles. None 
of them have a picture of a web-page behind them.




ArcGIS and MapModeller both use simple arrows/circles too. MapInfo doesn't seem 
to have this functionality. At this point these icons are standard conventions, 
but the QGIS 2.0 iconography makes that part only 1/6th of the actual icon, 
instead giving prominence to a magnifying glass that's entirely unnecessary.



While I agree to some degree (+1 for unified data adding button), I think we 
have to be fair and recognize that a GIS is a little more complex than a web 
browser and will always have more buttons. Many functions which have only one 
meaning in a simpler application can have different meanings in a GIS depending 
on context. To simply assume the context from the placement in a certain 
toolbar could raise other issues. 



Best wishes,Anita 

_______________________________________________

Qgis-developer mailing list

Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org

http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer







This transmission is intended for the named addressee(s) only and may contain 
sensitive or protectively marked material up to RESTRICTED and should be 
handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to 
receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to 
anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the 
sender immediately. All email traffic sent to or from us, including without 
limitation all GCSX traffic, may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in 
accordance with relevant legislation.
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer                          
          
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to