Releasing the source code to the public isn't a requirement of the GPL http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLRequireSourcePostedPublic
However once you give the source code to someone they can post it, so basically they can make it public for you. Normally companies do release the source code publicly because it is easier to control that way and centralize things. - Nathan On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Noli Sicad <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7/1/13, Nathan Woodrow <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Noli Sicad <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I rather see this "QGIS Enterprise" license under LGPL than GPL > > > > > > You can't. QGIS Enterprise == QGIS + extra stuff. > > > > - Nathan > > In my opinion, if it is GPL, QGIS Enterprise should be available to > Public as General "Public" License (GPL). > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License > > BTW, I have not interest in using QGIS Enterprise. I am happy with > QGIS 1.8 in Mac OS X. > > Noli >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
