Yes which is why I would rather not give the dev builds numbers apart from a commit ID and how far pass the last git tag it was. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3300746/deriving-application-build-version-from-git-describe-how-to-get-a-relatively
- Nathan On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Ramon AndiƱach <cust...@westnet.com.au>wrote: > Just for curiosity, did anyone have that problem with 1.9? > > -ramon. > > On 07/09/2013, at 15:40 , Nathan Woodrow wrote: > > > Hey Anita, > > > > I would just remove the 2.1 number as people might thing it's a released > version. Maybe replace it with Dev > > > > - Nathan > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Anita Graser <anitagra...@gmx.at> wrote: > > Hi Larry, > > > > Here's a generic 2.1 splash > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42637169/qgis21_0generic.png > > > > Best wishes, > > Anita > > > > > > > > Am 06.09.2013, 21:20 Uhr, schrieb Larry Shaffer <lar...@dakotacarto.com > >: > > > > > > Hi Anita, > > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Anita Graser <anitagra...@gmx.at> > wrote: > > > > Is it ok if we take a pic in Brighton? > > > > > > +1 from me. I think that's an excellent choice of photo. > > > > > > It could be something generic until then. If you want, I can whip > > something up. > > > > > > Right now, any users checking out the latest nightly are presented with a > > splash that denotes 1.9 (assuming they have the splash turned on) instead > > of 2.1. Not a big deal, but could confuse some users. > > > > Maybe replace that with a new layout that will basically be the same as > > when the Brighton photo is included? May be good to have the layout's > style > > be similar to the new stable version's splash, e.g. square corners and > > choice of font; but, not too similar, so it is easy to see at a glance > > which version you have launched. > > > > Regards, > > > > Larry > > > > > > Best wishes > > Anita > > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Larry Shaffer <lar...@dakotacarto.com> > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Does anyone have an idea for what the splash screen of the master > branch > > > builds should be? > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Larry > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Qgis-developer mailing list > > > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > > > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > _______________________________________________ > > Qgis-developer mailing list > > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Qgis-developer mailing list > > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer