Hi Olivier and everyone, I watched the video, this plugin sound good! I've been testing this plugin,
My computer: Window s 7 SP1 and 64 bits! I have two comment: 1- When enable the plugin I can't use the pan pressing the space keyboard 2- Don't work block de distance Thanks for merging the differents plugins editing. Good job! Regards, * <http://www.psig.es> * *Carlos López Quintanilla* www.psig.es carlos.lo...@psig.es +34 699.680.261 2014-01-30 Alexandre Neto <senhor.n...@gmail.com>: > Olivier, > > Very nice work! I'm still finding all I can do with it, but for what I > have seen it's alredy proven to be very usefull! > > Thanks alot! > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Olivier Dalang <olivier.dal...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hi ! >> >> Ok the plugin is published in the repo (with a nice icon for the occasion >> ;) ) ! Champagne ! >> >> >> *@Denis* >> >> I wanted to say that if you need a hand on implementing things in the >>> API, I can help. Although I am by far not the most advanced programmer >>> around, I am truly interested by your development. And I'm somehow in >>> charge of the map tools ;) >> >> >> *Help on the API is more than welcome ! (I'm too much of a newbie in C++ >> to do any serious work).* >> >> *I'd say the C and D improvements suggested in the readme are the easiest >> and could be a good point to start.* >> >> *The E improvement (an UI improvement rather than API improvement) would >> be welcome also (and be appreciated beyond the scope of this plugin).* >> >> *I'm not sure if the A use useful, but it should be easy to implement and >> may be useful to other plugins.* >> >> *B would probably require more work (refactoring every single map tool, >> unless we integrate the snapping hack as a default implementation, which I >> think is a very bad idea).* >> *I'd say before doing something like this, it could be a nice idea to >> think about the point I made in my last post about a more rigid base class >> for mapTools.* >> >> Do you have a build environment? If so, while in the feature freeze >>> period, we could work on a different branch. >> >> >> *Yes, so testing another branch is no problem.* >> >> By the way, was that a paid development or personal initiative? >> >> >> *It is a personal initiative (i'm of course open to post-work sponsoring >> ;) ).* >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Olivier >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Qgis-developer mailing list >> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
