Category in main QGIS tracker should be removed and all tickets moved into Processing subproject.
2014-03-26 11:46 GMT+02:00 Filipe Dias <filipesd...@gmail.com>: > Great, thanks Alex. > > I see a minor issue: users who are not aware of the Processing tracker will > probably open tickets in the main tracker with the general category > Processing/Sextante and won't be able to specify which is the affected > backend (the Processing bug tracker has a subcategory for each backend: SAGA > GIS, GRASS GIS etc). > > A possible workaround would be to replace the category Processing/Sextante > with Processing/SAGA GIS, Processing/R, Processing GRASS GIS etc. > > Thanks > Regards > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Alexander Bruy <alexander.b...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> thanks to Alex, now Processing/SEXTANTE bugtracker is >> a subproject of QGIS. All Processing tickets should be visible >> inside main QGIS tracker, but for submitting issue one should >> use Processing tracker. >> >> Please test. If this solution will not work fine for us we can always >> restore previous state. >> >> 2014-03-25 17:08 GMT+02:00 Alexander Bruy <alexander.b...@gmail.com>: >> > +1 from me to make Processing/SEXTANTE subproject if >> > this keep all tickets categories and allow to see Processing >> > bugs among QGIS ones >> > >> > 2014-03-24 21:32 GMT+02:00 Alex Mandel <tech_...@wildintellect.com>: >> >> As a sub-project, it would show up in queries of the main QGIS ticket >> >> system, but at the same time be able to have it's own internal >> >> categories. >> >> >> >> This to me seems the best compromise. It's really a big plugin with a >> >> myriad of backends. That complexity is what makes it a little different >> >> from the others mentioned. The others mentioned could be sub-projects >> >> of >> >> the main QGIS too. In reality all of them are core plugins, but they >> >> are >> >> still plugins. None of them are required to make QGIS work (boot). >> >> Hence >> >> they each have their own category. The challenge here is >> >> Processing/Sextante(I always call it by both since I do the the >> >> possibility of Processing stuff that isn't sextante) needs it's own >> >> categories/sub-categories. >> >> >> >> Also it's really easy for use to try moving it to be a subproject and >> >> then reassess (Takes about 30 seconds to move it). If it's still not >> >> right then we can talk about how to move tickets. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Alex >> >> >> >> On 03/24/2014 12:05 PM, Filipe Dias wrote: >> >>> Hi >> >>> I think Processing tickets should be in the main bug tracker, since >> >>> GDAL >> >>> tools, fTools and Grass plugin tickets are also there. >> >>> >> >>> Also, Qgis-Processing is a really big (and great) feature, that >> >>> interests a >> >>> lot of users, so it makes sense to keep its tickets in the main >> >>> tracker. >> >>> >> >>> Regards >> >>> F. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Alex Mandel >> >>> <tech_...@wildintellect.com>wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> On 03/24/2014 05:10 AM, Filipe Dias wrote: >> >>>>> Hi >> >>>>> >> >>>>> QGIS-Processing (former Sextante) has open tickets on two >> >>>>> bugtrackers: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> - the plugin bug tracker, built when it was a plugin, but with a lot >> >>>>> of >> >>>>> active tickets -> http://hub.qgis.org/projects/sextante/activity >> >>>>> >> >>>>> - the main bug tracker with a few open tickets -> >> >>>>> http://hub.qgis.org/projects/quantum-gis/issues >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I understand those two can't be merged in one go, because the >> >>>>> plugin-bugtracker has categories (QGIS-Processing SAGA GIS, >> >>>> QGIS-Processing >> >>>>> GRASS GIS etc) that don't fit in the main bug tracker. But this >> >>>>> should be >> >>>>> solved ASAP, because the current situation is quite confusing >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Regards >> >>>>> F. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> I'm of the opinion that the tracker should continue to be the Plugin >> >>>> tracker, not the main QGIS tracker. So I'd propse moving any >> >>>> Sextante/Processing tickets from the main or linking them into the >> >>>> Plugin tracker. >> >>>> >> >>>> To me it's still a plugin, just a core plugin but big enough that >> >>>> it's >> >>>> really a subproject. If we wanted to move the Plugin tracker as a >> >>>> sub-project of QGIS that would also make sense. >> >>>> >> >>>> Also Processing bugs aside from Processing not loading aren't >> >>>> showstoppers for release. >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks, >> >>>> Alex >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Qgis-developer mailing list >> >>> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org >> >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Qgis-developer mailing list >> >> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org >> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Alexander Bruy >> >> >> >> -- >> Alexander Bruy >> _______________________________________________ >> Qgis-developer mailing list >> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > -- Alexander Bruy _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
