+1 with Andreas for the same reasons . Another one is that we should really now take care of not changing ergonomy of main tools on each version...because many users took time to learn a professionnal tool, and have difficulties with self learning. IMHO, strong ergonomy changes should be grouped and tested alltogether in depth. I start to have users not liking a lot that tools change so often their behaviour (not me) , like digitizing end click.. Please
I agree identify window needs some improvements, but I think this is a mandatory feature . Some tweaks I had in mind (tickets existing for a while): - ability to change the options (first layer, current layer...) and open feature form accessible from identify window - abitlity to have fields in table order, or alphabetic order - semi-transparency (adjustable) - tooltips on fields that show fields comments and field true name if alias is set. Cheers Régis -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Identified-features-vs-Selected-features-could-we-merge-those-tp5132738p5132780.html Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer