The longer release time isn't for users its for us devs. After the feature freeze is lifted features start going in adding more bugs. So a longer release cycle with 2 months bug fix would allow for more polish.
This release was of course a major change adding some big stuff maybe we just expand this one? On Jun 6, 2014 7:47 PM, "Paolo Cavallini" <cavall...@faunalia.it> wrote: > Il 06/06/2014 11:36, Régis Haubourg ha scritto: > > BTW, the very short release cycle is really complicated for us. Deploying > > prod version and testing new versions periods overshoot here. I'm alone > on > > that topic, and partial time only. Having longer release candidate > period, > > and a 6 months release cycle could help for me. > > I understand this. However, you are free to upgrade only if and when you > have time > for it, e.g. skipping every second version will give you an 8 months time > frame. > IMHO the fixed release cycle will help people planning in advance (yes, > also the > investment for bugfixing :) ). > All the best, and thanks for your interest. > -- > Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu > Corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer