Hi Jean,
My idea is to have a stable version 3 times a year AND a long term stable for 12 months. In this way we have a compromise. Regards Lene [cid:image003.jpg@01CFA516.12FEB660] -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] På vegne af MORREALE Jean Roc Sendt: 21. juli 2014 18:42 Til: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org Emne: Re: [Qgis-developer] Stress about release plans Le 21/07/2014 17:35, Lene Fischer a écrit : > ·A long term stable version for ex. 12 months with bugfix only Those sponsoring a feature may feel that a year of wait until they find it in a public is quite long. > ·A developer version for 4 months with new features and bugfixes => > Stable version with short bugfix-period => New developer........ Most of the users of this dev version will be common users, before the release of 2.0 I often saw 1.9 versions installed and people on support forums suggesting the use of qgis-dev > I do know it will give the developers more work - I do know it will > cost more money - But I´m sure a lot of administrators will recommend, > use and support if we get a more stable environment. How many administrator are currently pushing to sponsor msi packages for their deployment ? _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
