2014-10-13 13:23 GMT+02:00 Andrea Peri <aperi2...@gmail.com>: > I guess no fiscale advantage there are for any funding GFOSS. > So seeing to fiscale advantage the fund to GFOSS are fund lost. > > I guess however that if a developer named "Count zero" give some code > developed by its own. > Why dont write "code founded by count zero with its own time" ? > The anonimy of the code is not a value. More better to know who found Every > piece of code. >
Every single log line has the committer's GitHub name so it isn't anonymous. My original concern was about advertising who pays the development **in the commit logs**. I just believe that commit logs are not the right place. I would rather prefer to see those informations in the release notes, on a dedicated web page, on printed materials, on T shirts, on coffee mugs, carved in stones, wherever you want but commit logs (and source code, except email addresses and copyright in the header, of course). Let me repeat it again: I'm absolutely not against providing full credits to funders, I'm against doing so in the commit logs, they are by devs for devs. Of course, I will be happy with any conclusion the community will agree upon, if any. -- Alessandro Pasotti w3: www.itopen.it _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer