I was referring to manual vetting. TSW On Feb 23, 2015 7:49 AM, "Alessandro Pasotti" <apaso...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2015-02-23 15:41 GMT+01:00 Trevor Wiens <tsw....@gmail.com>: > > In my experience Paulo has been doing good job of encouraging > developers to > > do just that. > > > > If we want to formalize it further it might be a good idea to set the > > requirements lower for experimental plugins as it happens to be a helpful > > means of facilitating testing plugins on different platforms. > > > > Hi, > > speaking as the Plugin's repository developer, I would say that > implementing different validation rules for experimental/stable > plugins would require some not trivial refactoring. > > But if is there anybody out there willing to help, why not? > > The code is here: > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Django/tree/master/qgis-app/plugins > > and the validator: > > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Django/blob/master/qgis-app/plugins/validator.py#L19 > > > > -- > Alessandro Pasotti > w3: www.itopen.it >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer