On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:31:34AM +1000, Nyall Dawson wrote: > On 13 May 2015 at 06:21, Giovanni Manghi <giovanni.man...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> See hub.qgis.org/issues/3792 for an example. > >> Opinions welcome. > > > > in cases like the above does not make sense to me leave the ticket > > open: the issue is fixed in master and for some reason it cannot be > > backported. > > +1. I think fixed in master should mean the ticket is closed. > Otherwise the bug tracker will become impossible to navigate and > filter by outstanding issues... > > Can we have a tag or category or something for "possible backport" as > a better way of tracking these issues?
What about using "Target Version". A bug fixed in master can be closed as long as it's "Target Version" is master. If someone thinks it should be also fixed in a stable branch, she could change "Target Version" to the next stable release and re-open it. (that's what I usually do) --strk; _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
