Paolo Cavallini wrote > Actually, I'm surprised none of our big users already stepped in: > maybe I'm missing something? > All the best, and thanks. > --
Hi all, my feeling about this for corporations: - Testers tends to become experts, skipping some use cases. I have million rows in some Db's but that never would came to me to send them to any tool without filtering it on SQL definition. I more commonly have thousands of records, and QGIS does it. Knowing the limitations with attribute tables, I don't test it a lot too.. So maybe almost nobody is testing that, when real user will.. later. - I'm sorry again I can't test more QGIS master by now, since I devote my time to currently new features I funded (proportionnal mapping, next Mask plugin version), and investigate more on QGIS server by now. As a conclusion, I think every GIS administrator gets less and less time testing when QGIS gets more mature and stable. That also means we have more real uses. It is a very good sign to me, though we need to find solutions to raise new testers and spread the working community. Cheers Régis -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Bug-priority-for-release-tp5210584p5210644.html Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer