Hi Matthias, On Mon, 13. Jul 2015 at 12:46:50 +0200, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > I think it would be great to branch a release-candidate-2_8_3 (no > binaries released, just to backport possible issues identified on the > release-2_8 binaries, related to pre-rc-commits). This way people can > happily continue to backport stuff.
What's the point if there are no binaries? Testing is done not intensive enough even with binaries - w/o binaries it's likely to be even worse. > Until this happens (and mainly for the situation where it does not happen) > *I would like to ask all committers to stop backporting to the > release-2_8 branch* as of tomorrow, July 14, 2015 (so you have still > today to push the urgent fixes you never got round to merge). > This way we'll have a stable 2.8.3 in the beginning of August. That's can be done without a separate branch - and w/o a separate branch there would be nightlies to test... My concern is more when https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/2197 is going to be resolved - as that is what 2.10.1 is waiting for. Jürgen -- Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31 Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13 Fax. +49-4931-918175-50 Software Engineer D-26506 Norden http://www.norbit.de QGIS release manager (PSC) Germany IRC: jef on FreeNode
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer