+1 to merge if other devs agree On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 5:45 pm Hugo Mercier <hugo.merc...@oslandia.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > I've submitted two Pull Requests : > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/2189 and > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/2322 that stay in a undetermined state > ... > > The first one (2189) is of particular interest here. It has been opened > in the beginning of July and I've been fixing issues spotted by others > (mostly Nyall), unfortunately at a lower pace than I would have liked, > busy on other projects. > > But agreement from other devs seemed needed to accept it. And ... this > agreement never came before the beginning of the feature freeze ... > So can you confirm this is now out of the scope of the 2.12 ? Or is > there a chance this would be an exception ? > > I guess this happened because everyone is busy, but it is not an easy > situation for me. > It becomes hard to target a particular release version when selling the > integration of new features and then it does not enforce confidence of > funders, I think. > > Do you see solutions to that for the future ? Probably the problem is > that integration of paid development depends on decisions made by > third-party developers that do their best to review PRs, but without > guarantee (i.e. are not paid specifically for that). What do you think ? > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
