I was planning to add Export functionality to Topology Checker during next HM in Gran Canaria... but now I'm confused where to focus my work. If I read well the code, the Topogy Checker have a result data structure where all geometry of the errors, bbox and more are maintained. I didn't test the SourcePole plugin and I don't know if it manage inter/layer check... well I remeber the presentation in Nodebo, but I didn't realize this kind of "plugin conflict". So, in this moment, I remain focusing my work on Topology Checker.
regards, Luigi Pirelli ************************************************************************************************** * LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli * Elance: https://www.elance.com/s/edit/luigipirelli/ * GitHub: https://github.com/luipir * Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli * Mastering QGIS: https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/mastering-qgis ************************************************************************************************** On 7 October 2015 at 09:25, Radim Blazek <radim.bla...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Paolo Cavallini <cavall...@faunalia.it> wrote: >> Il 06/10/2015 23:23, Nyall Dawson ha scritto: >> >>> We also should move the first one to the analysis library, so that the >>> routines are accessible by plugins and processing framework.... Just >>> another item on the TODO list! >> >> sure, big improvement. better opening a ticket? >> Giovanni, could you please add tickets for the missing features of the >> new plugin, and one for the removal of previous plugins? >> all the best, and thanks. > > I must say that I like more the concept of rules in Topology Checker > instead of one big dialog used in Geometry Checker. Both from UI and > programming point of view. It is more flexible and extensible. I am > curious why a new plugin was started instead of improvement of the old > one. I don't think that the Topology Checker should be simply removed > until we have something similar in terms of definition and > implementation of rules. > > Radim > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer