Il 24/10/2015 12:47, Nyall Dawson ha scritto: > No, that's not correct. Current thinking is 2.14 on schedule with only > minor changes/bug fixes, then 3.0 with api break, etc & major new > features 4 months later. > > So at most 8 months wait for a major intrusive feature. I think that's > acceptable.
I believe people who pays for a feature now expects it to be delivered in 4 months, not 8. Perhaps we should ask them how they feel about this. What would then be the difference between 2.14 and a 2.12 LTR? All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
