On 05/06/16 10:27, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote: > On 03-06-16 14:55, Matthias Kuhn wrote: >> On 06/03/2016 10:31 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote: >>> Il 03/06/2016 10:14, Richard Duivenvoorde ha scritto: >>> >>>> Any hints we could give python dev's? >>> Please start an howto where to accumulate tips and tricks for plugin >>> migration. >>> Thanks. >>> >> This is not related to migration. >> >> It's only Debian that decided to remove QtWebKit for Qt4 (on unstable if >> I am not mistaken). >> QtWebKit is available for Qt5. And on every other platform still for Qt4. >> >> The time may eventually come when QWebEngine will be a full replacement >> for QtWebKit. But as far as I know, it's not yet there. >> >> So I'd not make any noise around the issue. > yes, sorry for the noise, it is currently a problem for us as 'Debian > testing' users only, but the rest of the world is still ok.. > > @Matthias so part of the migration script/notes would be porting to > QWebEngineView/QtWebEngine from QWebview/QtWebKit
No, that will not be part of the migration. * QtWebKit is still there and will still be there in the near future. With Qt5 builds even on Debian testing. * As far as I know QtWebEngine is not yet on par with respect to features. Matthias > > Regards, > > Richard > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer