Ok, no problem with having "custom" versions. I wouldn't call "community version" the official one for the same reasons exposed by others. I'm only concerned for the rise of questions similar to this post, where users ask for support on custom versions with the serious risk of great confusion. Whoever decides to distribute its custom version should make clear that it isn't the official version and should provide specific support in case there are differences, e.g. distribution channels.
All the best, Giovanni Il 19/giu/2016 12:26 PM, "Jürgen E." <j...@norbit.de> ha scritto: > Hi Mathieu, > > On Sun, 19. Jun 2016 at 15:57:05 +0700, Mathieu Pellerin wrote: > > Im not a huge fan of the "community version" terminology. > > Same here - where "community version" is used it's often describes a > crippled > version that is missing some functionality. > > > Jürgen > > [5 (in words: five) "signatures" trimmed] > > -- > Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. > +49-4931-918175-31 > Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13 Fax. > +49-4931-918175-50 > Software Engineer D-26506 Norden > http://www.norbit.de > QGIS release manager (PSC) Germany IRC: jef on FreeNode > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
