Hi Nathan, no problem. Just wanted to send you some input. Hopefully it helps. You are doing a lot for the project and I understand that during 2.16 you were focused on the styling dock.
As always: thanks for your efforts! Andreas On 2016-08-01 01:26, Nathan Woodrow wrote: > Hey Andreas, > > Thanks for raising it as a issue. I will have a look this week and do some > clean up. I think I will make some more labels to show better status. > > Sorry for the lack of focus on them. > > Regards, > Nathan > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Neumann, Andreas <a.neum...@carto.net> wrote: > >> Hi all, Hi Nathan, >> >> I am looking at the QEPs from time to time that and I think it needs a >> little attention. Quite a few proposals would be ready to make a decision. >> Some QEPs are ready but lack funding. Perhaps we can introduce a new label >> stating "Needs funds" or something similar? It would help potential funders >> to pick things they like to see implemented. Quite a few of the proposals >> are already implemented, sometimes even if they don't have the "Accepted >> label" - i guess some of the implementations had time pressure due to the >> 2.16 list and thus couldn't wait for voting/acceptance. >> >> Devs want to start working on many of the issues mentioned in the QEPs - so >> decisions need to be taken in a timely manner. >> >> Here are some of my personal suggestions for changes / closings: >> >> - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/42 (Compulsory >> Unit Tests for Core Changes) - discussion stalled - but I think now would be >> the perfect timing to implement this proposal. >> >> - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/40 (Geometry >> redesign) - was implemented already 2 or 3 versions ago - should be accepted >> and closed >> >> - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/59 (aggregate >> functions) is accepted, implemented - it can be closed >> >> - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/58 (QGIS Styles, >> Symbols ans SVG Markers Sharing Repository) - is currently being implemented >> by Akbar - shouldn't it be voted on/accepted? >> >> - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/53 (WFS provider >> enhancements) - is already implemented and should be closed >> >> - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/49 (Label mask) >> - would be ready to implement, but lacks funding (add the new "Needs funds" >> label?) >> >> - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/46 (Labling >> path) - would be ready to implement, but lacks funding (add the new "Needs >> funds" label?) >> >> - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/45 (Long term >> releases) - implemented - should be closed >> >> - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/43 (Rename >> Compositions to Print Layouts) - would be good to be addressed during work >> for 3.x - can we continue discussion and vote on it? >> >> - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/39 (Layout >> rework (composer v2)) - Nyall wants to start on this - so it should be >> discussed and accepted >> >> - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/38 (Inheritable >> property collections) - unsure about the status here, apparently it has a >> prototype implementation. How does this relate to the variable system >> introduced recently? >> >> - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/37 (Fields and >> Forms Redesign) - would be a good candidate to be implemented during QGIS >> 3.x - probably lacks funding >> >> - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/35 >> (Authentication configuration system with master password) - already >> implemented. Should be accetped and closed. >> >> - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/32 (Add QGIS >> server access control interface for python plugins) - already implemented. >> Should be accepted and closed: >> >> - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/31 (QGIS Legal >> Entity) - accepted by Loomio vote and mostly implemented. Should be acepted >> and closed. >> >> - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/29 (QGIS 3.0) - >> discussion maybe a bit outdated? Close? >> >> It would be good, if we, as the project would take the QEPs a bit more >> seriously and maintain them accordingly. Seems like some devs do, some >> don't. Any comments? >> >> Thanks and greetings, >> >> Andreas
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
