Il 12/09/2016 11:55, Tom Chadwin ha scritto: > In a more minor way, I'd also like to think of a way to handle the various > "connect to a national service" type of plugins which are: > > 1. perhaps overly simple in aim for a plugin > 2. very similar in function to one another > 3. often of limited userbase-wide interest > > However, plainly some market need results in their being created (ease of > use, I guess), so I'm not sure what the solution is.
Agreed, and there are other cases as well. My approach is to apply a gentle pressure every time a new plugin of this type appears. I'm sometimes successful. Having a general guideline on this (never duplicate a plugin, always merge) would help implementing it, even thugh someone could be unhappy with it. All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
