Hey Mark, A QEP should be opened in order for review to take place on any design changes that might need descussion.
Also please note that 2.x is not receiving any new features as we are now working on 3.0. 2.x will only be bug fixes. Regards, Nathan On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 7:29 pm Mark Johnson <mj10...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I am preparing a worked over version of the Georeferencer and have come to > the stage where most of the adapted/new functionality is nearing completion > and the extensive testing starts. > > I have started working on a QEP, based on the template 'QEP-0-Template.md'. > > Since a full explanation of the changes and additions are extensive, it > may take a while to complete the draft. > > Since there is no Label 'Draft in preparation', my question is whether to > continue working on it here until the Draft is complete: > > https://github.com/mj10777/QGIS/wiki/QGIS-Enhancement:-Georeferencer > > or submit it now, completing it within the next 7-10 days. > > There is also the question: keep it short or (what I would prefer) > extensive? > > Mark Johnson, Berlin Germany > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
