The wiki information got outdated very fast, and was also not translatable easily. A decision was made a while ago for official documentation should be done int the same workflow as the website in order to streamline that process and make sure everyone is using the same tools.
- Nathan On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 10:18 PM, John Hawkinson <jh...@mit.edu> wrote: > I'm new here, so I'll ask the obvious question: > > Wikis are great because they lower the bar to collaboration. It's really > easy to make edits and you don't have to worry about them getting approved > and that's awesome. Really easy workflow, more so than github pull > requests. > New and potential contributors don't get discouraged. > > What's the reason for putting up barriers to documentation like this? > > Problems with spam or low quality edits? Can I find a robust discussion > of the tradeoffs in the list archives? > > --jh...@mit.edu > John Hawkinson > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
