I thought I turned that on a while ago? IMO +1 on this because it makes things nicer to read.
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Nyall Dawson <nyall.daw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Been thinking about this lately, with all the excellent work which is > being done on sipify and improving the usability of the PyQGIS through > docstrings and such... do we want to also turn on named argument > support for PyQGIS methods? > > I gather it's just a matter of adding the annotation KeywordArgs=All > to function definitions. We should be able to code this into sipify to > handle this automatically. > > I'd see the big benefit here would be readability of python code - no > more someMethod( True,False, 5, None) deciphering! > > The downside would be that the argument names would become part of > stable API. We've still gots lots of unhelpful argument names (things > like 's', 'c',.... ), so that's a potential downside if these get > locked in (although maybe we can fix them before freeze). > > Thoughts? > Nyall > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
