I tested this last night on a VM running 2.18.13 on Ubuntu 16.04 x64.
I commented out the lines in sources.list for the PPA to the Ubuntugis
archive and then issued the apt update command.
Checking the list, having excluded the Ubuntugis repository PPA, there
was no GDAL in the list of packages available for upgrade.
With apt upgrade, the packages were installed then 2.18.14 works fine.
I would comment out the ubuntugis repository PPA lines in sources.list
or its descendants (list files in sources.list.d) unless it actually
tells you that a package isn't available, which will presumably happen
with the next point release in about 10 days, if it has been built to
use the new version of GDAL.
On 28/11/17 20:59, Walter Lorenzetti wrote:
Hi Patrick,
thanks for reply and suggestions.
I compile from source the development edition, but for server and
desktop I use repository.
I'll try your example if the issue continue for long time.
W
Il 27/11/2017 16:33, Patrick Dunford ha scritto:
There is no mandated requirement to use the Ubuntugis repository for
2.18. The latest edition of 2.18 is available from the non-ubuntugis
Qgis repository for xenial.
Do you have that option available to you?
If you need the development edition (2.99) unfortunately the
developers are not supporting this on Xenial because of a package
dependency that is not supported by the Ubuntu repositories for
Xenial, even though it should in theory be possible to get the
required package(s) from another repository.
If you have used apt upgrade to update all the packages in your
system at once, including new ubuntugis packages, don't update all
the packages this way. Just update qgis by itself, and it won't pull
the new ubuntugis packages if it doesn't need them.
The more technically astute might try commenting out the ubuntugis
repository from apt's sources.list files or fragments before issuing
the apt update command, or playing with Apt pinning settings to
prioritise repositories.
Example: I installed Debian buster/testing and then attempted to
install Qgis 2.99 sid/unstable. This told me it needed a package from
Debian sid/unstable repositories. I changed the master repository for
debian to unstable and then apt update tells me there are hundreds of
new packages from unstable I could install. I only want it to install
the packages needed for qgis so instead of running apt upgrade, I
just run apt install qgis etc to only pull the unstable packages it
actually needs for this installation, and then change the Debian
master repository back to buster.
The above options may not suit every situation where ubuntugis has to
be used, obviously it does not suit your particular requirement if
you have to have the latest ubuntugis packages for other reasons,
however it may resolve the situation for someone else.
On 28/11/17 02:23, Walter Lorenzetti wrote:
Thanks Patrick for replay, I user ubuntugis for other project in my
work ..
W
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
--
Walter Lorenzetti phD
email: lorenze...@gis3w.it
skype: aiki74
twitter:w_lorenzetti <https://twitter.com/w_lorenzetti>
g+:aiki74 <https://plus.google.com/117055903318462447104/>
Tel/Cell: (+39) 347-6597931
Viale Verdi 24 - 51016 Montecatini Terme (PT)
Nuovi corsi QGIS e GFOSS
<http://gis3w.it/it/calendario-corsi-software-geografici>
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
