@Bernd, I don't want to open any can of worm :) . Reading again the discussion where you ask for it, I realize that no decision was taken on that BETA branding.
@Borys, thanks for the pointer. I'll see if Paul is available to merge that. Régis 2018-01-09 10:03 GMT+01:00 Borys Jurgiel <li...@borysjurgiel.pl>: > On wtorek, 9 stycznia 2018 08:55:22 CET Régis Haubourg wrote: > > Hi all, > > given the small impacts and the benefit of emptying the PR queue, can we > go > > for a merge of https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5663 (named > transactions > > in executeSQL)? > > I know we voted to not add it in the freeze exemptions, but that was in > the > > target of keeping a release date in end 2017. Now that time is passing, > and > > the hypothesis of a QGIS 3.0 "beta" being advertised, I think we should > > have it in the release. > > A small correction: we definitely voted to add it (11:2), just Paul was > opposed. > > https://www.loomio.org/p/EnrX0paG/-5663-add-a-name-for- > transactions-created-from-executesql > > Regards, > Borys >
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer