I know there is excitement, and I'm sure all the devs want the release done. However, I think Juergen's proposal is the best (release 23 Feb):
- more debugging time - tallies with established release cycle - respects the advice and plans of the Release Manager I 100% prioritise stability over early release. As you know, I'm not a QGIS dev, so I'm speaking to you both as a user and as the manager of an organization's installation base (about 30 seats). Yes, I know you will say we have LTR, but a significant aim of the QGIS project is to increase our user base. As Nyall says, many people will hear about the 3 release and try QGIS out. Stability is absolutely critical for those first-timers. Their point of comparison is everyone's favourite proprietary GIS. I imagine they also prioritise stability. Hope this makes sense Tom ----- Buy Pie Spy: Adventures in British pastry 2010-11 on Amazon -- Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-f4099106.html _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
