Hi Loïc, using both gitlab and github, I'd definitly would be in favor of gitlab, which would allow us to host our own servers. That would imply a big task switching travis to gitlab-ci. Cheers Régis
2018-01-12 18:21 GMT+01:00 L.Bartoletti <lbartole...@tuxfamily.org>: > On 12.01.2018 14:52, Denis Rouzaud wrote: > >> Hi all, >> > Hi, > >> I'ld like to raise a last call to switch to github issue tracker before >> the release. >> I'd like to summarize briefly why. >> >> Pros (to me): >> - integration with code and mainly with PR >> - avoid multiplication of platforms >> - so much more powerful (attachment, text formatting, referecing >> issue/PR, pinging people, fitlering/searching/tagging, possibility to >> plugin external issue management such as zenhub or others) >> - so much more responsive, mobile friendy and easy to use >> > Totally +1 > When I show in formations where you have to / can make reports, ask > questions, etc., the users - who are not all power users, far from it... - > prefer user-friendly interfaces and a single source easily googleable. > Apart from the different forums or stackexchange, GitHub is the best place > to do this. > > - Github has a close-source [...] I guess it leads down to pragmatic vs >> ethical matters. >> > Open question: How do you feel, (Have you ever had any thoughts), about > migrate to gitlab (and using github as a mirror)? > > Regards. > > Loïc > > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
