Il 31/01/2018 10:23, Alexander Bruy ha scritto:

> We just simply does not have enough resources to maintain more than
> 600 algorithms from GRASS and SAGA.

> I still think that Processing should be in core with minimal set of algorithms
> (native and GDAL), all other providers should be plugins and installed by
> users. Ideally these providers also should be maintained by interested groups
> of devs/users, not by QGIS devs.

I understand the point all too well; the big risk here is these
providers will fall into oblivion, with a big damage to QGIS as a whole.
Overall, I'm in favour of keeping these as a part of the project,
supported by it.
All the best.

-- 
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to