Il 31/01/2018 10:23, Alexander Bruy ha scritto: > We just simply does not have enough resources to maintain more than > 600 algorithms from GRASS and SAGA.
> I still think that Processing should be in core with minimal set of algorithms > (native and GDAL), all other providers should be plugins and installed by > users. Ideally these providers also should be maintained by interested groups > of devs/users, not by QGIS devs. I understand the point all too well; the big risk here is these providers will fall into oblivion, with a big damage to QGIS as a whole. Overall, I'm in favour of keeping these as a part of the project, supported by it. All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
