+1 also from me to the removal of the providers from core. IMHO I would also remove GRASS, but I understand it could be a tough decision. The provider system + plugin architecture provide all the means to keep them separate from the core.
We all agree, I guess, that less is better then more, to guarantee the highest quality we can afford. Giovanni Il 1 feb 2018 09:23, "Paolo Cavallini" <cavall...@faunalia.it> ha scritto: > Hi Rashad, > > Il 31/01/2018 10:43, Rashad Kanavath ha scritto: > > > What I can propose is to lower the burden on maintenance but the code > > should be put back to qgis if possible. > > So qgis can focus on issue related only to that and after a while things > > will stabilize. > > > > Indeed, if there is something broken in this algo otb team will help fix > it. > > thanks for your offer, much appreciated. Would this include also the > inclusion of OTB in the standalone installers for Windows? It would be > good to make sure we always have the most appropriate version, both for > 32 and 64 bit. > All the best. > > -- > Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu > QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html > https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
