Hey Carlo, I guess we are a bit confused at the moment because the goal of QGIS has never really been that at all, at least not post v1. We have always aimed to make it the best it can be for a lot of different workflows.
I'm not sure I would consider anything in QGIS a step backwords at all, There has been a crazy, and I mean crazy, amount of dev work to create a better product for end users. - Nathan On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 6:21 PM, Carlo A. Bertelli (Charta s.r.l.) < carlo.berte...@gmail.com> wrote: > No pun intended, when you announced what you were going to do, I used > MapInfo as my main GIS and Thuban as a viewer and I hoped very much you > were starting something that was went further. > Since version 0.11 I was using QGIS as my "main" GIS. What I was saying is > that the continuous improvement made all users rely on a dependable QGIS. > Departing from a cautious approach to a very fast development pace means > users can keep an LTR for day to day working (no advanced needs) and an > "evolution" approach for the advanced features. I didn't think that saying > "viewer" I diminished the huge effort of these years. The "viewer" approach > is still a plus of QGIS and it's not something easy to accomplish if I see > the work on Processing and what has been done for GRASS. I think being a > "viewer" for GDAL means getting all of the benefits of an evolving project. > This has its drawbacks, some processing that is needed at the feature level > was available only on layers as a whole. I meant that, the last major > version is a further step that asks for more dependability. > My apologies for all the developers who felt injured by my words. > c > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 12:04 AM, Tim Sutton <t...@kartoza.com> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On 03 Mar 2018, at 20:43, Jürgen E. Fischer <j...@norbit.de> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Sat, 03. Mar 2018 at 12:43:00 +0100, Carlo A. Bertelli (Charta s.r.l.) >> wrote: >> >> but also abandoned the idea of QGIS as a simple viewer that acquires >> editing >> abilities by plugins. >> >> >> Was that ever a goal? If so, I didn't know - but I have been around only >> for a >> bit more than 10 years ;) >> >> >> Yeah I think the idea of being a full fledged GIS rather than a simple >> viewer has been with us for many years already….glad to see it is really >> taking hold with 3.0 though :-) Great to have your inputs Carlo. >> >> Regards >> >> Tim >> >> >> >> Jürgen >> >> -- >> Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. >> +49-4931-918175-31 >> Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13 Fax. >> +49-4931-918175-50 >> Software Engineer D-26506 Norden http://www.norbit. >> de >> QGIS release manager (PSC) Germany IRC: jef on >> FreeNode >> _______________________________________________ >> QGIS-Developer mailing list >> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> >> >> >> >> --- >> >> *Tim Sutton* >> QGIS Project Steering Committee Chair >> t...@qgis.org >> > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Carlo A. Bertelli > Charta servizi e sistemi per il territorio e la storia ambientale srl > Dipendenze del palazzo Doria, > vc. alla Chiesa della Maddalena 9/2 16124 Genova (Italy) > tel./fax +39(0)10 2475439 +39 0108566195 <010%20856%206195> > mobile:+39 393 1590711 <393%20159%200711> > e-mail: berte...@chartasrl.eu http://www.chartasrl.eu > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
