Hi!

It seems that I have forgotten to send my reply to the mailing list...

matteo <matteo.ghe...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia sexta, 16/03/2018 às 08:38:

> Hi Alexandre,
>
> > Maybe I am missing something, why would lose the information? Because it
> > has not been released?
>
>
> I mean that if not documented step by step (so new algorithms or changes
> to existing ones), in a couple or releases a lot of documentation will
> be orphaned.
>
> Right now (actually after months of discussions, PRs, ecc.) we have a
> pretty stable system also for this doc section and we should try to keep
> it updated like we are trying to do with the general doc.
>

I see no reason for us to not update any new feature imediately,
independently of the QGIS version it has landed. Testing documentation is
aiming for QGIS 3.4, until then, it's just that, testing documentation.

IMHO. After QGIS 3.4, if the documentation is too behind, we can think of
branching to allow keeping documenting new features arriving in master
(3.5+).

But as you well know we are too few to maintain all the dev work.. And I
> cannot see an easy way out of this.
>
> Matteo
>

cheers,

Alex
-- 
Alexandre Neto
---------------------
@AlexNetoGeo
http://sigsemgrilhetas.wordpress.com
http://gisunchained.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to