Hi Allessandro, I have made a submission to talk about this at the FOSS4G-FR and FOSS4G in Dar-Es-Salam
This is a work based on a fork of PyWPS 4 - many thanks to them - (with a lot of changes and many additions!) and act as a standalone server - nothing to do with https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/wps4server/ <https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/wps4server/>. Actually we are stabilizing with Qgis 3.0 branch (the API change quickly, and we are catching changes as fast as possible), and at some point it is going to be published on github. We are testing this on a real use case and we plan to have something in production ready very soon. To be short: the server reuse processing algorithm the same way they are used in the desktop - without modification. A marshalling is done between WPS parameter and Processing parameters. Results can be stored in temporary projects and published as WMS service with Qgis server. The server is based on full asynchronous http server (Tornado) and makes an heavy use of asyncio and use Redis as storage backend for job status. > Le 20 mars 2018 à 11:03, Alessandro Pasotti <apaso...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > Hi Michael, > > can you share some details about this project? > > Is it based on other existing stack like PyWPS? > > Is it related with https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/wps4server/ > <https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/wps4server/>? > > Thanks! > > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 7:46 PM, kimaidou <kimai...@gmail.com > <mailto:kimai...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Hi > > Very quick answer: > We (3liz team) are indeed developing a full server stack to be able to use > QGIS processing algorithms server side. It will be fully opensourced. No real > web admin panel in project, but we use Lizmap Web Client as a web front end > to published algs. > > We will try to come back here asap with a full description and road map. If > you want to contact us directly, please use i...@3liz.com > <mailto:i...@3liz.com> address. > > Regads, > Michaël > > > 2018-03-12 10:56 GMT+01:00 johnrobot <johnro...@gmail.com > <mailto:johnro...@gmail.com>>: > My previous post didn´t seem to render much interest and I am a bit curious. > Is this not of interest to anyone else? Was I too vague? Does the task > involve to much work at the moment? I still think that it would be a great > addition to QGIS, especially in corporate environments. > > > > -- > Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-f4099106.html > <http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-f4099106.html> > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org> > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer> > > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org> > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer> > > > > -- > Alessandro Pasotti > w3: www.itopen.it > <http://www.itopen.it/>_______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
