Hi all, I very much think that the WFS client is an really bad state, and is not really reliable, especially in WFS-T context. The good news is that we just have been funded to refactor it ! The work should start in september and land in 3.6. I will let our dev's come here with more technical details about the goals. I hope we will also be able to take benefit of this to this the OGC compliancy of the client here. Best regards, Régis
Le lun. 3 sept. 2018 à 11:36, Tom Chadwin <tom.chad...@nnpa.org.uk> a écrit : > I can't offer any helpful suggestions, but just to let you know I finally > had > to disable all my plugin WFS tests. I used to cope, by rerunning failed > Travis runs, but by about three months ago, it seemed no longer usable - > failure after failure. > > I was using a third-party WFS, and perhaps I could have got round this by > adding a WFS provider to the test docker image, but in this plugin's case, > I > didn't think it worth the significant effort to do so. The WM(T)S tests > also > use third-party sources and seem stable, so perhaps this wasn't the > underlying issue anyway. > > If an improvement or solution could be found, it would be great to > reinstate > these tests. > > Thanks > > Tom > > > > ----- > Buy Pie Spy: Adventures in British pastry 2010-11 on Amazon > -- > Sent from: > http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-f4099106.html > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer